On February 8, Jersey City became the first New Jersey municipality to say through action it is no longer accepting death by car crash as part of its citizens lives by the adoption Vision Zero.

“In most road transport systems, road users bear complete responsibility for safety. Vision Zero changes this relationship by emphasizing that responsibility is shared by transportation system designers and road users,” from a paper presented by Ingvall and Haworth at the 2016 6th International Road Safety & Traffic Enforcement Conference.

New Jersey’s Toward Zero Death street safety policy is not working. In 2017 overall death of pedestrians by car crash was at a three year high.  People are continuing to die on New Jersey roads. They are dying, because in New Jersey we accept crashes as accidents. We accept policy based on the faulty idea that death from crashes is about bad personal choice and not about bad engineering and bad data.

Vision Zero does not accept that some people have to die, so that some people can get to where they are going in in their cars slightly faster. Vision Zero emphasizes infrastructure and education.

If we want a New Jersey that has Complete Streets, streets that all people can use regardless of ability, race, age, or mode of modality of the user, we have to have streets that are just and fair.  We must have street design and technology that supports fair and just streets. We must have cycle tracks (protected bike lanes), safe crosswalks, and pedestrian plazas.  We also need reduced speed limits and good public transit. Finally we must have good public policy. The police have to stop being the sole tool used in African-American and Latino communities for traffic safety. It is bad and lazy policy.

In African-American and Latino communities street design, technology, and systematic change is historically not prioritized.  In these communities safety in regards to urban planning and transportation is put almost exclusively on the individual through police via punitive individual consequences.

For communities of color the police have been a huge part of enforcement in regards to safe streets policy and in many communities of color they have been the only component of safe streets policy.

Vision Zero is a chance to turn the tide against punitive enforcements on communities of color. Vision Zero is a chance to make real fundamental change to the infrastructure of all communities.

Vision Zero began in Sweden in 1997. In Sweden getting to work as quickly as possible is no longer prioritized over safety.

In 2014 Vision Zero came to the US via New York. In 2014 New York City had the fewest pedestrian deaths in its recorded history.

In 2014 New York reformed Stop-and-Frisk a policy to harass and terrorize pedestrians that overwhelmingly impacted African-American men.

In 2013 191,558  people were stopped owing to Stop-and-Frisk. 56% African-American 29% Latino. 88% innocent.

In 2014 45,787 were stopped owing to Stop-and-Frisk.  53% African-American. 27% Latino. 82% innocent.

The harassment of people because of their race does not make streets safer. Fixing infrastructure and good policy does. In 2017 New York City allocated $400 million for Complete Street infrastructure owing to Vision Zero.

Vision Zero cannot just be for predominantly white and middle class communities.

Vision Zero needs to continue to be embraced equitably as it was intended with the four principles Vision Zero adopted from the World Health Organization:

  • Ethics: Human life and health are paramount and take priority over mobility and other objectives of the road traffic system
  • Responsibility: providers and regulators of the road traffic system share responsibility with users;
  • Safety: road traffic systems should take account of human fallibility and minimize both the opportunities for errors and the harm done when they occur; and
  • Mechanisms for change: providers and regulators must do their utmost to guarantee the safety of all citizens; they must cooperate with road users; and all three must be ready to change to achieve safety.

Roads in Sweden are built to prioritise safety over speed or convenience. Low urban speed limits, pedestrian zones, and barriers that separate cars from bicycles,” from the Economist.

Infrastructure, technology, and smart policy are all keys to the success of Vision Zero.

Vision Zero was about equity in its inception and it needs to continue to be about equity in New Jersey.  Policies are only as fair and just as the people implementing and interpreting those policies.

People in bicycle/pedestrian advocacy, urban planning, social justice,  and public health need to continue to be in the conversation for Vision Zero and  continue to push the conversation on topics  like racism, which so much bad transportation policy in New Jersey and around the United States is based on.

Vision Zero is about not accepting a little bit of death or a little bit of racism, just so some people can get to where they are going a little bit faster.

by Lark Lo

(This is modified from my Transportation Alternative May 2017 column.)

Complete Streets according to the Smart Growth America are streets for everyone.

They are streets designed for the comfort and safe access of everyone who uses the streets. Complete Streets are streets that people who have disabilities can use, people who are caretakers can use, people of all ages can you, people who are on bicycles can use, people who take public transit can use,  and people who are just walking can use.

Complete Streets are streets designed, so that we can all get to work, the store, the park, and school with comfort and ease.

A Complete Street lets you walk across the street safely and comfortably. A Complete Street allows you to safely and comfortably bicycle on it. A Complete Street doesn’t require seniors with mobility issues to be escorted across it.

Complete Streets are streets that we can all share whether we’re walking, cycling, taking public transit, or in our car.

Complete Streets are NOT just a stop sign, a crosswalk or a sign that says slow down. Complete Streets is a holistic approach to traffic (and people are part of traffic) that uses different solutions depending on what a community needs to make the streets of a town accessible, comfortable and safe for everyone who uses them.

Complete Streets gives us all real choices in how we get around and avoids the social engineering that forces you to be in a crash-cage of steel. Complete Streets allow us to choose to get around our communities in the healthiest and most sustainable ways.

​The public comment period for Plan 2045: Connecting North Jersey, the TIP, STIP and conformity determination began Tuesday, October 10, 2017 and concludes Thursday, November 9, 2017.
Submit formal public comments please use our online form: https://apps.njtpa.org/Plan2045/providecomment.html or email tritter@njtpa.org.

You can also fax comments to 973-639-1357 Attn: Ted Ritter.

PDF of PLAN 2045 full draft


Watsessing isn’t a county road and crossing over to Grove shouldn’t be a daredevil activity, but it is.

When Mayor Venezia was asked by Nelsha Moorji the following question  in the comment section of the Bloomfield Pulse:

The corner of Bloomfield Ave and Watsessing used to be a really bad intersection. Since the Aldi development we finally got the proper traffic lights for that intersection. [Mayor] Michael Venezia can we get some sort of traffic control on Grove and Watsessing? The new traffic light on Watsessing and Bloomfield is so appreciated but the corner of Grove and Watsessing is still in need of a solution. Thank you.

Venezia responded:


On Tuesday, 10/24 Joseph N. DiVincenzo Jr. Essex County Executive stated on twitter that in order to get a crosswalk, which I would hope with be inclusive of a four way stop sign,  that a traffic study and resolution would have to be passed.


So from Mayor’s Venezia’s response I would gather those steps are already underway, because of the leadership of the current administration of Bloomfield.

Thank you Mayor Venezia for taking the lead on making our streets safe.

VELO Bloomfield will continue to follow this story.


Lark Lo

We’re voting on the scariest intersection in Essex County. Are you in Bloomfield, Montclair, Verona, Orange, Newark or nearby? Do you have a terrifyingly unsafe intersection to share. Share it here!

Winners chosen by combination of data and best descriptions.

This is the intersection of Watsessing and Grove, it is on the edge of Halcyon Park. Inside Halcyon Park is pleasant to walk in, because its narrow streets don’t allow people to drive their cars faster than 15 miles per hour.

Watsessing and Grove are at the end of the NJ Lightrail. Grove (in Bloomfield not to be confused with the county road of Grove in Montclair) is a local street, so has a stop sign. The county road of Watsessing has no stop sign, because it is a county road and it needs to be as fast as possible, safety and common sense be damned. 

Children who live south of Bloomfield Avenue cross this street daily going to Bloomfield’s middle and high schools, they walk through Halcyon Park, because it is safe and Bloomfield Avenue is unpleasant and scary for people not in cars.

People with children walk their two year olds across this street going to the light rail to get into Manhattan for work.

Do we really have to wait for someone to be injured or killed in a crash to discuss fixing this unsafe intersection?
-Editorial staff


Tuesday, October 17: Voter Registration Deadline for General Election

Tuesday, October 31: Deadline to apply for a Mail-In Ballot by Mail for General Election

Monday, November 6:  3:00 p.m. Deadline for In-Person Mail-In Ballot Applications for General Election

Tuesday, November 7: General Election

You can register to vote by downloading a registration form at http://nj.gov/state/elections/voting-information.html#vrf. Please fill out the form for your county of residence. Once the form is complete, mail or deliver it to the County Commissioner of Registration or the Superintendent of Elections. If you need assistance or have questions, please call 1-877-NJ-VOTER (1-877-658-6837.)

If we want Complete Streets in Essex we must vote for people who promote Complete Streets policies.

We must share the road with all forms of transportation.

Walking, riding a bike and using a wheelchair are all forms of  transportation.


VOTE on November 7. Polls are open from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m.

Your voice counts!

Sample Ballot from Essex County


Info on ballot measures from Ballotpedia:

New Jersey Public Question 1, the Bonds for Public Libraries Measure, is on the ballot in New Jersey as a legislatively referred bond question on November 7, 2017.[1]

“yes” vote supports authorizing the state to issue $125 million in bonds to provide grants to public libraries.
“no” vote opposes authorizing the state to issue $125 million in bonds to provide grants to public libraries.

The state librarian, with approval of the president of Thomas Edison State University, would develop the eligibility criteria for libraries to receive grants. Grants would cover 50 percent of the cost of projects. The other 50 percent would be provided by a library’s local government. Private donors would be allowed to contribute toward the 50 percent provided by a local government.[1]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The proposed ballot title is:[1]

Do you approve the “New Jersey Library Construction Bond Act”? This bond act authorizes the State to issue bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $125 million. The proceeds of the bonds will be used to provide grants to public libraries. The grants will be used to build, equip, and expand public libraries to increase capacity and serve the public.[2]

Ballot summary

The proposed interpretive statement is:[1]

Approval of this bond act will allow the State to sell $125 million in State general obligation bonds. Proceeds from the bonds will be used to provide grants to construct, expand, and equip public libraries. Municipalities or counties that fund public libraries will match the grant amount. The municipality or county may solicit private funding to support its match. The State Librarian, in consultation with the President of Thomas Edison State University, will set eligibility criteria for the grants.[2]

New Jersey Public Question 2, the Revenue from Environmental Damage Lawsuits Dedicated to Environmental Projects Amendment, is on the ballot in New Jersey as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 7, 2017.[1]

“yes” vote supports allocating state revenue from legal settlements related to natural resource damages in cases of environmental contamination toward restoring and protecting natural resources and paying the costs of pursuing the settlements.
“no” vote opposes this amendment to allocate state revenue from legal settlements related to natural resource damages in cases of environmental contamination toward environmental projects and paying the costs of pursuing the settlements.


Design of the amendment

Question 2 would create a lockbox for state revenue from legal settlements and awards related to natural resource damages in cases of environmental contamination. Revenue in the lockbox would be used to restore or replace damaged or lost natural resources, protect natural resources, and pay the legal costs of pursuing settlements and rewards. The state would be required to prioritize the use of revenue in the fund to restoring the immediate area related to the settlement or case. If no project is deemed reasonable in the immediate area, then the revenue would be spent in the same water region. Up to 10 percent of the revenue in the fund would be authorized to be spent on state agencies related to the amendment, such as the Department of Environmental Protection.[1][2]

Revenue from contamination settlements

The amendment was proposed in response to disagreements between Gov. Chris Christie (R) and the Democratic-controlled New Jersey Legislature on how to spend revenue from large pollution settlements involving pollution in the Passaic River and Exxon Mobil. Gov. Christie’s budgets planned to spend about $103 million of the $580 million received from the multiple cases on environmental restoration.[3][4][5] While the case involving Exxon Mobil is being appealed, the cases involving the Passaic River brought in $355 million, of which $288 million was used to balance the state budget.[6]



Do you want to do something when you ask for street safety and are told, “it’s a county road, so pick another street to not get hit by a car on, yes, we understand Bloomfield, Grove, Franklin, Watchung are the actual problems, but since we can just tell you ‘it’s a country road’ and you’ll go away then hey, you’re not pushing it, we’re not going to push it. ”

Do you want that to stop happening?

We know we want it to stop happening. .

VELO Bloomfield is having a meeting on Sunday, October 15 at Halcyon Park, Bloomfield. VELO Bloomfield is having a meeting on Sunday, October 15 at Halcyon Park, Bloomfield. We’re organizing for change. We have the power to make our neighborhoods pleasant and walkable.

RSVP for address VELOBloomfield@gmail.com

Bureaucracy shouldn’t be a barrier to street safety.


This slideshow requires JavaScript.